回答|共 74 个

xkclzf LV12

发表于 9-10-2012 14:19:46 | 显示全部楼层

goldenstar 发表于 9-10-2012 13:34
IB 上已经可以申购了。

闭眼买一把?

金老, IB 申购 怎么用?我找不到可以申购IPO的选项!

xkclzf LV12

发表于 9-10-2012 14:22:03 | 显示全部楼层

小狮租房
我找到了,谢谢!

goldenstar LV5

发表于 9-10-2012 14:23:15 | 显示全部楼层

xkclzf 发表于 9-10-2012 14:19
金老, IB 申购 怎么用?我找不到可以申购IPO的选项!

DBS里是
Investment & Trading  >> Electronic Security Application (ESA) >> Apply for ESA

狮城理财 LV13

发表于 9-10-2012 14:24:23 | 显示全部楼层

退市,又上一次!


Courts to list  on SGX again
2012-10-09 00:31:44.970 GMT


By jonathan kwok
     Oct. 9 (Straits Times) -- ELECTRONICS and home furnishing
retailer Courts is seeking to list on the Singapore Exchange
(SGX) less than four years after it delisted at the height of the
global financial crisis.
     A restructured vehicle, Courts Asia, is selling 178 million
shares at 77 cents each, the top of an earlier-set indicative
price range.
     About 76.9 million units are for institutional and large
investors in a placement exercise, 77.9 million shares are for
cornerstone investors and 14.3 million units are for key
management.
     The public tranche is 8.9 million shares. Retail investors
have until noon on Thursday to subscribe. Courts Asia shares are
expected to debut next Monday.
     The placement tranche has been more than three times
oversubscribed, said Mr Matthew Song, head of equity capital
markets for South-east Asia at HSBC, which is the global
coordinator, bookrunner, underwriter and issue manager.
     Courts Asia will sell a mixture of new shares and stock from
its controlling shareholder, Singapore Retail Group (SRG), which
is paring its stake.
     SRG had privatised Courts Singapore from the local bourse in
December 2008. A year earlier, SRG's parent, Asia Retail Group,
delisted Courts Mammoth from the Malaysia bourse.
     Asia Retail Group, whose owners include Barings Private
Equity Asia and Kuwait-based Topaz Investment Worldwide, spent
the next few years restructuring and improving the business.
     Operations in Thailand and Indonesia were closed down as
were many stores in loss-making Malaysia. Malaysia's remaining
stores were overhauled and new ones set up. The Malaysian
operations returned to the black and are bundled with the
Singapore business for the Courts Asia listing.
     The 2007 delisting had valued Courts Mammoth at RM288
million (S$116 million) while SRG had spent about $103 million to
privatise Courts Singapore. The market value of Courts Asia will
be much higher, at about $431 million when it lists next Monday.
     But chief executive Terry O'Connor said the valuations then
and now should not be compared due to the different business
performance for Courts Asia. "We've more than doubled our profits
in the last two years, and that (two years ago) was a multiple of
where we started. So I think there's no direct pricing comparison
when you are looking at such a different scale in terms of
operating performance," he noted. "Every which way you look at
it, you can't compare the old and the new."
     Mr O'Connor said Courts Asia wants to have only one listing,
without another one across the Causeway.
     SRG will get $86.2 million in net proceeds from paring down
its stake while Courts Asia will get $43.8 million from selling
new shares.
     Courts Asia will use over 90 per cent of its takings to
expand into Indonesia.
     The stores it had earlier closed down were in Bali, Lombok
and East Java but now Courts Asia wants to open much larger
stores in Jakarta.
     "We intend to launch megastore formats which have retail
areas exceeding 60,000 sq ft in urban areas to better capture our
core targeted customers - the rising middle class in Indonesia's
growing cities," said Mr O'Connor.
     This is the fourth time Asia Retail Group has moved to sell
off - or reduce its stake in - Courts Asia.
     It hired bankers to sell the asset in October last year,
said an earlier Reuters report, adding that the business could
fetch US$400 million (S$492 million). Following that initiative,
the business attracted several bids from interested parties
earlier this year. It is unclear why a sale did not go through.
     A planned listing in 2010 was halted amid valuation
concerns. Asia Retail Group also tried to sell the business in
2009 for US$300 million but could not find buyers, reports said.
     [email protected]

Copyright 2012 Singapore Press Holdings
-0- Oct/09/2012 00:31 GMT

WAYNEWEI LV18

发表于 9-10-2012 14:26:35 | 显示全部楼层

老鼠爱小米 发表于 9-10-2012 13:26
貌似申购价高了点啊。新加坡有多少家courts呀?

"当初选择除牌是为更好地整合业务"

说得好听,其实当时已经濒临破产边缘了。经过专业的清盘重组公司处理,才把牌子留下来的。

其实呢,当初除牌不管什么原因,能够生存下来就是好事。何必此地无银三百两。

老鼠爱小米 LV9

发表于 9-10-2012 14:33:29 | 显示全部楼层

WAYNEWEI 发表于 9-10-2012 14:26
"当初选择除牌是为更好地整合业务"

说得好听,其实当时已经濒临破产边缘了。经过专业的清盘重组公司处理 ...

你的意思,COURTS不值得申购?

vivocity2010 LV5

发表于 9-10-2012 14:34:47 | 显示全部楼层

重组再上市,本身就是一种圈钱行为!:L;P

WAYNEWEI LV18

发表于 9-10-2012 14:50:48 | 显示全部楼层

老鼠爱小米 发表于 9-10-2012 14:33
你的意思,COURTS不值得申购?

我不会发表是否值得申购的结论.只是针对某句话某个点说说而已。
这几年,发展最好的是建筑酒店旅游之类跟赌场经济有相关的行业,相反,零售业是举步维艰。电器类的利润率更是低得可伶。
这些是客观事实。其他的,俺不是神仙,没法预测。

WAYNEWEI LV18

发表于 9-10-2012 14:57:57 | 显示全部楼层

vivocity2010 发表于 9-10-2012 14:34
重组再上市,本身就是一种圈钱行为!

任何公司,上市本身就是一种圈钱行为。当然可以换一种好听的说法而已。
而且,许多企业上市一般都要经过重组的过程。当然,具体重组的方法和形式各不相同。把除牌公司重新包装或者借壳上市,都是一种方式。
圈钱无所谓,只要能给投资者带来回报。认为有回报可能的就出手,没有信心的就算了。

JUNZIZI LV15

发表于 9-10-2012 15:13:12 | 显示全部楼层

没信心了。。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册会员

本版积分规则