小小01

laoqiang1986 发表于 28-8-2015 21:43
我最喜欢不收税，高福利的政策。没时间看完所有帖子，但是见过税率低的，见过福利高的。税率很低，福利很高 ...

你看第二楼帖子。

你 在哪里取得资金以提供这一些福利?它可否会导致国家破产?

These benefits will be financed by the annual return from investment of our reserves.
Existing law allows the government to spend up to half of the total return on our reserves.
In the last few years, the amount allotted to the national budget for this purpose was $8 billion per annum.
Our proposed social safety net costs less than this annual amount. Hence it will not bankrupt the country.
我们的储备投资年收益能资助这些社会福利。
现行法律允许政府花费高达一半储备的总回报率。
在过去的几年中，用于此目的金额是每年国家预算里的$80亿。
我们所提出的社会安全网的成本低于此年度金额。因此，这一些不会导致国家破产。

我愛空壹格

小小01 发表于 28-8-2015 19:52
我在中国背包旅行，然而在沈阳，我只能入住有星级的饭店，应我没有中国身份证。即使是著名的如意商务饭店 ...

呵呵，水涨船高那得看多大一片水，你在井里扔个石子儿当然高了。。。

小小01

小小01 发表于 28-8-2015 21:50
你看第二楼帖子。

你 在哪里取得资金以提供这一些福利?它可否会导致国家破产?

补充： 它是在重新分配有限的资源。发放更多在社会福利福祉上面。

小小01

我的中文词汇有限。

laoqiang1986

小小01 发表于 28-8-2015 21:58
我的中文词汇有限。

只要不是IQ有限，告诉我低税收高福利是哪些国家，秘诀是什么？in English

小小01

我在沈阳呆过，我觉得他们的生活幸福感不低。傍晚的夜市，一家老少，在广场里跳广场舞，练武功，打乒乓，打羽球，好温馨，好有家的感觉。在饭店里，服务员也很尽责的带着微笑。这一切的一切在新加坡已不复存在。我们国人日夜为三餐为物质，已忘了做人的意义。当更多的人放弃物质的追求，我们的国家也会更有冲劲。我相信国人为先的理念在建造一个国家上是不错的。

小小01

小小01 发表于 28-8-2015 21:55
补充： 它是在重新分配有限的资源。发放更多在社会福利福祉上面。

再补充：
另一方面,我们目前的税收体制是高度不公平的.公司和个人的税率是低的,但征收我们的间接税是特別的高.一个累进税系统是个公平的税收系统,因为它将允许境况较好的公司及个人,回报过去所得到好处.然而,既使当我们增加社会庞大开支时我们也預测不会在往后十年内会有任何征税需要.反而,我们将除掉消费税GST.因会GST是提高我们基本生活费的显著因素.它给中产阶級和低收入的新加坡人带来不合理的负担。GST消除后，我们也不需要征收新税来补偿GST收入的损失.

小小01

laoqiang1986 发表于 28-8-2015 22:01
只要不是IQ有限，告诉我低税收高福利是哪些国家，秘诀是什么？in English

国人为先是鼓吹重新分配有限的资源。改善现有的税务制度。

小小01

laoqiang1986 发表于 28-8-2015 22:01
只要不是IQ有限，告诉我低税收高福利是哪些国家，秘诀是什么？in English

Our current tax regime is highly regressive with low corporate and personal income taxes on the one hand, and high indirect taxes on the other. A progressive tax system is more equitable and fair as it will allow the better off to repay, through higher taxes, benefits received from others. However we do not envisage any need for it in at least the next ten years even when we increase social spending substantially. Instead we will make our tax system less regressive by removing the Goods and Services Tax. The GST imposes an unfair burden on middle and lower income Singaporeans as it raises their basic cost of living significantly.  We do not see the need to impose new taxes in other areas to make up for the loss of the GST reven

小小01

laoqiang1986 发表于 28-8-2015 22:01
只要不是IQ有限，告诉我低税收高福利是哪些国家，秘诀是什么？in English

请看第三楼的帖子：


our current tax regime is highly regressive with low corporate and personal income taxes on the one hand, and high indirect taxes on the other. A progressive tax system is more equitable and fair as it will allow the better off to repay, through higher taxes, benefits received from others. However we do not envisage any need for it in at least the next ten years even when we increase social spending substantially. Instead we will make our tax system less regressive by removing the Goods and Services Tax. The GST imposes an unfair burden on middle and lower income Singaporeans as it raises their basic cost of living significantly.  We do not see the need to impose new taxes in other areas to make up for the loss of the GST reven